Deleted



Deleted
Font size:
Collection  PDF     
 

Written on January 02, 2024

Submitted by Symmetry60 on January 02, 2024

Modified by Symmetry60 on February 27, 2024

0 sec read
69

Quick analysis:

Scheme
Characters 7
Words 1
Stanzas 0
Stanza Lengths

Steven Dupere

With a book of poetry to boast, Waltz of Semantic Tongues, Steven has been challenging nervous canvases for more time than time can shake an eon at. This is a shard of that fallout. more…

All Steven Dupere poems | Steven Dupere Books

17 fans

Discuss the poem Deleted with the community...

2 Comments
  • MaximillianWiseman
    What an exquisite piece that'll remind any kids of their beautiful mom
    LikeReply3 months ago
    • Symmetry60
      Thank you very much. I appreciate your kindness, comment and time. Mom would also be appreciative. ;-)
      LikeReply3 months ago
  • Noddy
    Although the poem is at odds with itself both rhythmically and metrically (the abcb slips up in the second verse, recovers and just hangs on; the 5 3 4 3 iambic pattern also slips up in verses 3,4 and 6) and could use another round or two of revisions, for this reader the poem was engaging on a visceral level.
    The central metaphor of a legacy, a “carrying forward “ as the poet puts it, that sense of unfulfilled potential finally brought to fulfillment, of debts paid in the very person of the son and his willingness to pick up those”shreds”(shards?),“sedentary” (sedimentary?) aspects of a life less lived than undergone, is forcefully captured in the overall wistful tone of the poem.
    Although the momentary lapses of craft cause the poem to stumble and intrude slightly on its overall success, these are more than redeemed in the strong imagery and the elegiac quality of the whole. Ah yes, mothers and sons.
     
    LikeReply 13 months ago
    • Symmetry60
      99% here are not literary majors which is why most write to the level of respective, educative backgrounds.

      I write solely for the pleasure of writing and never to fulfill the mundaneness and lifeless tedium of poetic policy. Poetry too structured loses its humanity and its humanness. Imperfection is what I, and most others, seek as to promote and emote upon a human playing field. That is precisely why the most technical poems seldom win in this medium. Believe me, I've tried to no avail - not a single vote. People don't care about meter or metric near as much as being moved or related to - tears over technicality 24/7/365.
      I sincerely appreciate the critique but will continue to construct and construe in human fashion such as those here who seek the fragility of fallibility over the dispassion of policy and procedure. ;-)

      That you were able to, and willing to, overlook these apparent shortcomings as to cast your vote in my direction is telling. I very much appreciate the honesty, but nothing will change from my vantage point.

      If you'll note, nearly every individual on this sight tends more to support one another than to over critique. We're primarily comprised of 9-to-5ers, grandmothers, truckers and fuckers who write as a release and not to appease parameter.

      Thank you for your vote. It is appreciated. Be well.
       
      LikeReply3 months ago
    • Noddy
      You are of course correct about the folks on the website in every respect, their motivation and their poetic preferences. Where we part company I think is over the issue of what you call technicality and I’d prefer to call craft. I truly believe we can have tears and technique. The so-called judging criteria that gets dutifully attached every month nudges us toward taking tears and technique into consideration when we’re responding and I tried to do that when responding to your poem. That it came off as heavy-handed to you I regret. I simply subscribe to the notion that every writer/artist has to at some time get to grips with the craft involved in any creative act. It’s clear to me from many readings of your poem you yourself were striving for craft. We’re not so far apart really.
      My thanks for your honesty. We can keep the conversation going any time you like! Cheers  
      LikeReply 13 months ago
    • Symmetry60
      At no point do I feel you're wrong. I completely agree. We're simply two sides of the same coin. I didn't take the critique as anything but constructive. I was merely letting you know where I stand in terms of how I approach what I consider to be a hobby I am willing only to take as far as I am willing to take it.

      I've always been a bit rebellious in my approaches to any endeavor I've undertaken. I've run the gamut in terms of hobbies over the years, so you can assume I'm the jack-of-all-trades guy who's good at many but master of none. I'm okay with that. What I lack in parameter I make up for in passion. I do love to write. I also love to hit the gym like I have for 47-years, drum, play tennis, martial arts, golf and so on down the pike. I'm a wanderer at best and poet when the spirit moves me.
      I sincerely appreciate the critique. I understand that to be great at anything we must first and always be a student. I simply am not looking to color my poetry between the lines of poetic policy beyond where I feel compromised. I like my Ted Nugent Free-For-All style. LoL

      I hope to see you around the way in any regard. Thank you for the vote and your time.
       
      LikeReply3 months ago

Translation

Find a translation for this poem in other languages:

Select another language:

  • - Select -
  • 简体中文 (Chinese - Simplified)
  • 繁體中文 (Chinese - Traditional)
  • Español (Spanish)
  • Esperanto (Esperanto)
  • 日本語 (Japanese)
  • Português (Portuguese)
  • Deutsch (German)
  • العربية (Arabic)
  • Français (French)
  • Русский (Russian)
  • ಕನ್ನಡ (Kannada)
  • 한국어 (Korean)
  • עברית (Hebrew)
  • Gaeilge (Irish)
  • Українська (Ukrainian)
  • اردو (Urdu)
  • Magyar (Hungarian)
  • मानक हिन्दी (Hindi)
  • Indonesia (Indonesian)
  • Italiano (Italian)
  • தமிழ் (Tamil)
  • Türkçe (Turkish)
  • తెలుగు (Telugu)
  • ภาษาไทย (Thai)
  • Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
  • Čeština (Czech)
  • Polski (Polish)
  • Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
  • Românește (Romanian)
  • Nederlands (Dutch)
  • Ελληνικά (Greek)
  • Latinum (Latin)
  • Svenska (Swedish)
  • Dansk (Danish)
  • Suomi (Finnish)
  • فارسی (Persian)
  • ייִדיש (Yiddish)
  • հայերեն (Armenian)
  • Norsk (Norwegian)
  • English (English)

Citation

Use the citation below to add this poem to your bibliography:

Style:MLAChicagoAPA

"Deleted" Poetry.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 11 May 2024. <https://www.poetry.com/poem/180503/deleted>.

Become a member!

Join our community of poets and poetry lovers to share your work and offer feedback and encouragement to writers all over the world!

May 2024

Poetry Contest

Join our monthly contest for an opportunity to win cash prizes and attain global acclaim for your talent.
20
days
2
hours
29
minutes

Special Program

Earn Rewards!

Unlock exciting rewards such as a free mug and free contest pass by commenting on fellow members' poems today!

Browse Poetry.com

Quiz

Are you a poetry master?

»
A poem consisting of 14 lines, typically with a specific rhyme scheme, is called a _______.
A haiku
B epic
C limerick
D sonnet